Back

Meet our team / Phil Scully

Phil Scully

Partner

Partner in the property litigation team

My role

I am a partner and lead the property litigation team. I advise clients including registered providers, charities and local authorities on property-related disputes.

I have experience of a wide range of estate management issues, including 1954 Act lease renewals, dilapidations claims, service charge disputes, rent arrears claims, insolvency issues and forfeiture and possession proceedings, break clause disputes and breach of alienation and user provisions.

I also advise clients in connection with the proper interpretation and effect of conditional sale agreements, option and overage agreements; applications for, and objections to, adverse possession and prescriptive rights claims; restrictive covenants and nuisance/trespass claims.

My experience

I am a member of the Property Litigation Association and ranked in the Legal 500 as a Next Generation Partner. I am experienced in acting for clients in court proceedings, arbitrations and expert determinations.

Legal 500 says:

‘Phil Scully was great to work with on a particularly challenging issue. His advice was clear, well thought out and ensured the matter was concluded swiftly.’

‘Phil Scully has strong experience and technical knowledge in property litigation, is very reliable and combines straight-talking advice with a pleasant, personable manner.’

‘Phil Scully demonstrates an understanding of our sector and a pragmatic approach; willing to take the time to explain complex legal issues and consider all angles.’

“Phil Scully is approachable, technically excellent and incredibly supportive.’

My specialisms

  • Property litigation

Blog


My latest articles

Lawmaking, platform breaking? Is the decision of the Tate Gallery really going to change the law of nuisance?
Lawmaking, platform breaking? Is the decision of the Tate Gallery really going to change the law of nuisance?

The Supreme Court decided that the Tate’s viewing platform constitutes a nuisance to the neighbouring residential flats. It is being touted by the press as ground-breaking for the law of nuisance. We disagree.