Over the last few years the meaning of “asset management” has changed from it being all about repairs to an understanding of, well, managing an asset and, in particular, understanding assets might not stay in an organisation forever.
Many, if not most, registered providers (RPs) know the total costs of managing a particular asset and especially can identify those assets that are expensive to manage. The surplus generated by any social housing property is finite and can easily be turned into a loss in the event of higher-than-average management costs.
The other understanding that has developed within RPs is the market value of an asset. Coupled with an understanding of where assets are truly needed means there are multiple routes to deciding that some properties need to be sold on the open market when they come up as a void.
The stock rationalisation market is also developing; there is a growing market for shared ownership portfolios (providing a holy grail for pension funds through the ability to give “guaranteed” Retail Price Index (RPI) returns) as well as a lively market for other types of social housing. Supported housing portfolios have come to market; disposing providers wish to exit that market or prefer to leave to others redevelopment.
Current issues are:
- Ethical stock rationalisation – is moving properties that are expensive to maintain and live in into what typically is the private rented sector the kind of thing registered providers should be doing? It is conceivable the Regulator will become interested in this issue in which case providers need to be ready with a cogent answer.
- Stock swaps – after a very long gestation period (we wrote the original NHF Guide in 1997!) there are actual large transactions underway. Stock swaps can provide a more cost-effective solution for stock rationalisation given that both parties are in the same negotiating position.
- Tenant consultation – though the Moat downgrading happened over a year ago, providers are still working through the need to engage critically with tenants when there is a contemplation of the sale of their homes. In our view, being transparent with tenants about why their property is being sold, what the new provider’s offer is, (as it affects tenants), and providing a “warts and all” appraisal of the provider and, most particularly, remembering that tenants are charitable beneficiaries of providers are the issues providers need to take into account.
For more information
Please contact Jonathan Cox.
Jonathan is speaking on “Ethical Stock Rationalisation” at Homes UK 2019.
Latest news
New code puts complaint handling in the spotlight
he updated Housing Ombudsman’s (HO) Complaint Handling Code (the New Code) will become a statutory requirement on 1 April 2024 and will bring a significant step change for registered providers (RPs).
Monday 25 March 2024
Read moreAnthony Collins appoints returning partner as new head of funding
Specialist law firm Anthony Collins (AC) has appointed a new head of funding, returning partner, Jon Coane. Jon brings with him over 25 years of experience as a social impact […]
Wednesday 13 March 2024
Read moreLatest webinars and podcasts
PODCAST: 12.07% holiday accrual is back… But not for everyone!
In the podcast we will outline the new Working Time Regulations legislation in detail, noting when the provisions coming into force, whilst also providing practical examples and guidance for employers across all sectors.
Friday 1 December 2023
Read moreRenters Reform Bill webinar – June 2023
The Renters Reform Bill proposes a seismic change to housing management practices, abolishing assured shorthold tenancies and 21 notices entirely and making changes relating to rent increases, pets, possession grounds and more.
Friday 18 August 2023
Read more