Lasting Powers of Attorney (LPAs) can be extremely powerful documents in terms of enabling others to deal with your affairs when you have lost the capacity to do so for yourself. The legislation seeks to strike a balance between the regulated oversight of the attorney’s actions by the Office of the Public Guardian (OPG) whilst imposing some checks and balances to try and prevent abuse of vulnerable individuals.
The current regime of LPAs, therefore, requires a certificate provider to countersign the document to confirm that the donor has the mental capacity to make the document and give the power. Once completed, a power of attorney also has to be registered with the OPG before any attorney can begin to exercise their powers.
The legislation and accompanying regulations contain various rules and restrictions about who may act as certificate provider or witness to the donor’s and the attorney’s signatures. Once again these are designed to try and prevent abuse of vulnerable individuals. Unfortunately, however, they can often catch out the unwary with significant implications.
The recent case of the Office of the Public Guardian and PGO, MAB and MJD ([2019] EWCOP13) is a case in point. BGO executed both a finance and a health and welfare lasting power of attorney in which she appointed her husband and two solicitors as her attorneys with authority to act jointly and severally. Both of the LPAs were registered by the OPG, and it was only sometime later that a financial institution noticed that the donor’s signature had been witnessed by one of the attorneys – it would seem by one of the solicitors.
The current version of the LPA document makes it clear that an attorney and a replacement attorney must not witness the signature of the donor. As a result of this error (which was not picked up by the OPG), the court confirmed that the legislation renders the document invalid and incapable of rectification. As a result, the only way forward was either to complete fresh lasting powers of attorney if the donor still had capacity or to apply to the Court of Protection for the appointment of a deputy because the donor had lost capacity.
Whilst the Court of Protection will appoint a deputy in relation to an individual’s financial affairs in almost all cases, it is far less willing to grant a health and welfare power of attorney – especially with the same wide scope of a health and welfare lasting power of attorney. In this case, the donor had lost capacity so that it was not possible to create fresh lasting powers of attorney. The costs and regulatory regime for Deputyships are more expensive and time-consuming than LPAs highlighting the need to observe the regulations carefully.
Further information
For further information about any of the issues raised in this ebriefings, please contact Clare Burke.
Latest news
Double partner hire for housing and property team
Digby Morgan and Kate Davies join social purpose law firm, Anthony Collins’ housing sector and property team enhancing its expertise in affordable housing development, stock rationalisation and regeneration.
Friday 11 April 2025
Read moreStaying friends through a split
More couples are choosing to divorce as amicably as possible, demanding an increase for specialist mediation services and less contentious options, such as ‘collaborative law’. But is it really possible to split and stay friends?
Wednesday 19 February 2025
Read moreLatest webinars and podcasts
Podcast: Service charge and estate charge for registered providers
In this episode, Penny Bournes and Emma Lloyd examine how the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 will impact private registered providers, particularly in terms of service charge administration, cost […]
Wednesday 19 March 2025
Read morePodcast: Service charge and estate charge for local authorities
In this episode, Penny Bournes and Emma Lloyd examine how the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 will impact local authority landlords, specifically regarding service charges and estate management charges. […]
Monday 3 March 2025
Read more