If a periodic tenant dies without leaving a will, the correct process for bringing the tenancy to an end is to serve a Notice to Quit (NTQ) at the property addresses to “the personal representatives of [name of deceased tenant]”. A copy of this notice must also be served on the Public Trustee, which means sending the Public Trustee a copy of the notice along with form NL1 and the appropriate fee (currently £40).
There is often a delay in sending the copy NTQ to the Public Trustee, either because the housing officer is waiting for a cheque to be raised for the fee, in which case the delay may only be a few days, or because the officer was not aware they needed to send a copy to the Public Trustee, in which case the delay could be considerable. It has always been unclear what impact any delay has on the validity of the Notice.
In March 2017 a County Court decided the case of Hackney LBC v Henry. In this matter, a copy of the NTQ was sent to the Public Trustee over 17 months after it was served at the property. The Council accepted the fixed date of expiry in NTQ could not be effective as it had not been served on the Public Trustee, but sought to rely on the savings clause in the NTQ and argued that the four-week period ran from the date of service on the Public Trustee.
The Judge upheld the tenant’s argument that:
- The NTQ was “served” on the day it was left at the property (albeit, the NTQ was not “sufficiently served” until the copy was sent to the Public Trustee) and therefore the savings clause ran from the day the NTQ was left at the property; and
- Even if the savings clause could be relied on from the date the copy NTQ was sent to the Public Trustee, it would breach the common law requirement for clarity as the deceased tenant’s personal representatives would need information they do not have (i.e. the date a copy was sent to the Public Trustee) in order to ascertain when the NTQ will expire.
The Judge is reported to have stated that “it is not asking a lot of the Claimant to get it right. They only needed to send two notices on the same day” (emphasis added).
Whilst this decision is not binding on other courts (because it was decided in the County Court), it is likely to be persuasive. The case is due to be reported in the next edition of Legal Action Group News which is read by many housing lawyers and advisers. You might start to see Defence solicitors scrutinising the date a copy NTQ (or other relevant notice if it is a fixed term tenancy) was sent to the Public Trustee in more detail and arguing that the Notice was invalid if not sent the same day.
Therefore, we suggest that landlords should:
- Plan ahead so that the relevant notice is served on the property and posted to the Public Trustee on the same day, which might mean delaying service on the property until everything (including the cheque for the Public Trustee) is ready to go;
- Ensure that you keep a copy of your covering letter to the Public Trustee and form NL1 and include these in your particulars of claim or witness evidence when issuing a possession claim; and
- You usually get a standard acknowledgement letter from the Public Trustee, but not always. If you receive the letter of acknowledgement back from the Public Trustee, include this in your witness evidence (either your first statement or a subsequent statement if already issued).
For further information, please contact Rebecca Sembuuze. To find out more about the work that we do in housing management, please visit our website.
Latest news
Anthony Collins advised B3Living on strategic acquisition of 250 social homes
The social housing team at Anthony Collins advised Hertfordshire-based B3Living on the successful acquisition of 250 social homes from Orbit Group.
Tuesday 19 November 2024
Read moreAnthony Collins promotes and appoints 19
19 promotions and appointments have been announced including two partners, two legal directors, two senior associates and four associates, as well as a number of appointments within the central management […]
Monday 4 November 2024
Read moreLatest webinars and podcasts
Podcast: Who gets the microwave? Episode 2 – Non-court dispute resolution
Listen to the second in a series of podcasts from our matrimonial team where Tom Gregory, Chris Lloyd-Smith and Maria Ramon put down their litigation weapons and discuss the importance of […]
Friday 22 November 2024
Read morePODCAST: Who gets the microwave?
The first in a series of podcasts from our matrimonial team begins with the team discussing what happens to pets during divorce and separation.
Friday 16 August 2024
Read more