If it wasn’t for the bare trees outside my window and the threat of a “cold spell” later this week, we could almost imagine we were back in late spring and the crisis days of lockdown 1.0; government guidance is coming thick and fast with much of it hitting our screens late on a Friday, Treasury Directions are read avidly for glaring contradictions and news of the PM’s health is shared from Downing Street.
So what are the take-away points from last week’s activity, following on from my colleague, Katherine Sinclair‘s ebrief on 11 November?
Notice
Following Katherine’s “heads up” in the ebrief, the Government has now confirmed that for claim periods post 1 December, employers will not be able to claim for employees who are serving their notice; either statutory or contractual. This includes employees who have resigned as well as any who are made redundant. We suspected this was coming down the track but it is now confirmed. This marks a change from the previous scheme and reiterates the Government’s desire to keep as many people as they can on PAYE for as long as they can.
TUPE
The change that has been made to the TUPE provisions is one of those that is small in syntax but hugely significant for those affected. The original guidance of 10 November appeared to suggest that employees who had transferred under TUPE after 1 September could not be furloughed by their new employer. This would rather negate the purpose of TUPE to protect the rights of the transferring employees. However, the guidance change on 12 November rectified this. It now states that “employees being claimed for should have been employed by their prior employer on or before 30 October 2020 and; transferred from them their old employer to their new employer on or after 1 September 2020; employed by either their old employer or new employer on 30 October 2020; and on a PAYE Real Time Information (RTI) submission to HMRC, by their old or new employer between 20 March 2020 and 30 October 2020, notifying a payment of earnings for that employee”.
Returning early?
We have further clarification regards employees returning from maternity leave early in order to be furloughed. Earlier last week, the guidance gave no mention of agreeing to reduce the eight week notice period for early returners who prefer to be put on furlough at 80% salary rather than SMP. The 13 November guidance clarifies that an earlier notice period can be agreed and an employee can return and be placed on furlough according to that newly agreed date. Again a specific point but none the less key for those it affects.
As always, we are only several emails away from new government updates and this update is correct at time of writing on 16 November.
For more information
Please contact Libby Hubbard if you require any further information.
Latest news
Anthony Collins advised B3Living on strategic acquisition of 250 social homes
The social housing team at Anthony Collins advised Hertfordshire-based B3Living on the successful acquisition of 250 social homes from Orbit Group.
Tuesday 19 November 2024
Read moreAnthony Collins promotes and appoints 19
19 promotions and appointments have been announced including two partners, two legal directors, two senior associates and four associates, as well as a number of appointments within the central management […]
Monday 4 November 2024
Read moreLatest webinars and podcasts
Podcast: Who gets the microwave? Episode 2 – Non-court dispute resolution
Listen to the second in a series of podcasts from our matrimonial team where Tom Gregory, Chris Lloyd-Smith and Maria Ramon put down their litigation weapons and discuss the importance of […]
Friday 22 November 2024
Read morePODCAST: Who gets the microwave?
The first in a series of podcasts from our matrimonial team begins with the team discussing what happens to pets during divorce and separation.
Friday 16 August 2024
Read more